Alexander Scriabin

A personal history with Scriabin
Other composers influenced by Scriabin
A select Scriabin discography

A personal history with Scriabin

I enountered the spellbinding music of Alexander Scriabin at a critical moment in my musical development. In late high school I wasn't so sure how serious I would be in music, or whether it would be as a composer or a performer. A completely intoxicating, inspirational experience would be needed for me to become a true enthusiast. In 1991, I perused the discography in the obituary of Vladimir Horowitz in the New York Times, and ordered what seemed to be the most interesting item: the CBS Masterworks disc devoted to Scriabin. I had already known the C-sharp minor Etude op. 2 no. 1 and the D-sharp minor Etude op. 8 no. 12 that Horowitz had helped to immortalize; I also vaguely recalled an incredible Scriabin piece I had heard as an encore at a piano recital, so I knew that I should get to know this composer better. This disc proved to be quite a fortuitous introduction to this world; it would still go on my list of the great CD's of the works of Scriabin, or indeed of any piano music.

Initially, the composer cast his spell on me with those perfect miniature pieces from his early and middle periods. The great collections of early Scriabin piano music are the Preludes, op. 11, and the Etudes op. 8 and op. 42. This music succeeds uniquely in combining formal perfection with pianistic virtuosity and the most ardent Romanticism - both ecstatic and tragic - that speaks directly to the heart, in an authentic Russian accent. Yes, it is true that this music was highly influenced by Chopin, but how couldn't it be? Chopin was a great inspiration for the whole history of Russian music-making. It isn't quite so popular to point out how heavily the more "canonical" composers Debussy and Ravel were indebted to Chopin and to Liszt's innovative techniques, but in any case these kinds of influences should hardly be used to denigrate any of the spectacular achievements of any of these composers.

At the end of this Horowitz CBS disc was some music of a different and remarkable character: the Ninth and Tenth Sonatas, and Vers la Flamme. At first I wasn't so sure what to make out of these extravagant gesticulations, but as I continued to listen, this late music ("psychedelic music," said the liner notes) cast a truly magical spell with its highly imaginative, mystical character. Colors and images radiate from the piano; fires sputter and crackle unpredictably in their cauldrons; caressing waves abound, alluring the listener, who is carried away by an ardent, winged flight; dangers also abound - quite suddenly and unexpectedly horrible demonic processions, poisonous magic spells, and creatures of darkness intrude on the landscape. Even with so much adventure, the composer's "Apollinian" formal control always manages these Dionysian elements, making still more powerful the sensation that one is being harassed by some powerful supernatural forces on these journeys. An imaginative and completely individual harmonic system, breaking the bounds of tonality, gives the composer special new possibilities. This harmony can be sometimes so dense with chromatic inflections that one wonders if he is even using the cracks between the notes! This "saturated" quality contributes essentially to the intensity of these mysterious visions. The later music held its fascination for me for the longest time, and Scriabin owes his current reputation among music historians largely to these same inimitable late works, even though they are somewhat less frequently performed than the early music, which is easier for the audience on first hearing.

Certainly I needed to participate in such music much more than just from the perspective of a listener. I wanted to create it from the piano, and I spent many hours in rapt fascination at the keyboard. It all kept me quite busy practicing. For the first time I began to practice regularly, and I haven't stopped to this day! The nature and quality of it have changed, but I still have to remember with some nostalgia the time when I played through the tenth sonata at least once a day for several months in a row! Even after the performance it took me several years to lose the itch to sit down and play through this incredible piece.

Now, it is quite easy to look back and pinpoint this as my true beginnings as a serious pianist. It is why I enjoy using the code-name "scriabin" for my email address, my website, my Internet Chess Club handle, my license plate (CKPRBIN, an odd sort of Cyrillic/English mixture), etc. .. ! Scriabin lovers are notoriously fanatical in their devotion and enthusiasm. I have gotten into some interesting conversations as a result of this. Since this period of intensive fascination I have explored, discovered and appreciated the appeal of other regions of the literature, and I have rounded out my repertoire and knowledge of music thereby. However, Scriabin's music will always hold a significant and honorable position in my repertoire. I hope that I am doing my part to spread the inspiration and fascination of this music.

Back to the top


Other composers influenced by Scriabin

Igor Stravinsky and Sergei Prokofiev

HAHAHA!!! These two composers wouldn't want you to know it, but here they are, properly exposed as having fallen under the spell of Scriabin for a time, vigorously though they may both at times have denied it.

Prokofiev steered away from Scriabin, almost self-consciously or even defensively. He demanded of his students, "No dominant ninth chords!" However one occasionally detects some Scriabin in Prokofiev's more atmospheric (perhaps "French" sounding) creations (some parts of his second sonata spring to mind). It was perhaps Prokofiev's intuition for Scriabin's world that caused him - in his typically undiplomatic manner - to criticize Rachmaninoff's performance of the Scriabin Fifth Sonata. These two composers never got along ever since that incident.

Stravinsky came down very hard on Scriabin in the middle of his blathering anti-Romantic rhetoric in which he claimed that music was incapable of expressing anything. (For if you believe this, you would have to conclude that Scriabin had misspent his entire life, except perhaps for having kept himself well entertained.) Nevertheless Stravinsky is known to have been completely fascinated by this music at a time. Even without biographical information, some of his early music could have documented this fact quite well enough (Stravinsky never hesitated to draw freely - at times we might even say steal? - from his sources of inspiration). The Firebird ballet, in its full version, is full of sensuous, languid sections that are unquestionably redolent of the Scriabin perfume, especially in their harmonic content. Even though we can look back and say that Stravinsky changed radically after the Firebird, we still must place this ballet as one of Stravinsky's masterpieces; at the least, it secured his reputation.

It was also Stravinsky who asked the very penetrating question worth contemplating: "Scriabin. Where did he come from? And who are his forebears?" In fact, Scriabin was so individual as to defy any easy categorization, and his music is internally so driven by an esoteric mysticism that following his path is particularly hazardous for a composer. This mysticism was inspired and fueled by Symbolist poets, such as Madame Blavatsky. Scriabin's concept of the passage of time, and of the internal logic of a composition, are certainly non-Western. The composers who embraced elements of Scriabin's style were most successful when they had Eastern philosophical concepts of their own to guide them on their path. For Prokofiev and Stravinsky, who were to work with the traditional forms of Western music and its orderly way of progressing through time, the Scriabin influence was a pernicious one that had to be eliminated. Perhaps their anti-Scriabin rhetoric was ultimately necessary in order for them to free themselves from his influence and get on with exploring their own distinctive personalities.

Olivier Messiaen

Messiaen, one of the distinctive voices in the twentieth century, is a perfect example of how elements of Scriabin's approach could be employed effectively in combination with a fresh mystical philosophy from the East. It is surprising that the many similarities between the two composers have not been more widely acknowledged. Shared stylistic elements include: some aspects of harmonic usage (Scriabin's "symmetrical scales" - the whole tone and octatonic - are identical to the first two Messiaen modes of limited transposition), an infatuation with Eastern philosophical ideas (and thus an explicitly "programmatic" content in the music), a desire to express ecstatic visions through music, a clearly stated relationship between sounds and colors, and curiously enough, a documented lack of perfect pitch!!

It is fortunate that Messiaen directed his mysticism in a very different direction - through his Catholic faith (as opposed to Scriabin's often egocentric theosophy and Symbolism) - because this gave him entirely new artistic imperatives and possibilities of expression. Messiaen also contributed an interest in birdsong, and expanded the mathematical relationships among tones that Scriabin had begun to probe and exploit in his later music. Since Messiaen's extramusical goals were more honorable (I think we could safely say), we can follow his programmatic designs with more interest, and he certainly deserves his status as a 20th century giant. However, if we consider the music itself apart from the sources of its inspiration (admittedly a dangerous approach to use too often), we must observe that Messiaen's music is often rather passive and even sentimental in its depiction of divine love. Although all of this is clearly by design, I find it more remarkable what Scriabin was able to do with his apparently static harmonic language; his music is nevertheless always suffused with yearning and desire.

Karol Szymanowski

Here is another composer I feel particularly devoted to, and who really deserves a page of his own on here. (Please see my recordings website for more on Szymanowski.) Szymanowski can rightly be considered the greatest Polish composer since Chopin; as both an idealist and a fastidious perfectionist, Szymanowski continued this tradition while infusing new life and original approaches into it, meanwhile absorbing the quickly changing cultural landscape of the early 20th century. Szymanowski was often found poring over the music of Chopin and Scriabin; his Etudes, op. 4 - while successful pieces in their own right - are quite obviously modelled on some of the better known Scriabin miniatures.

In his "middle period" Szymanowski is heavily influenced by later Scriabin, in his similarly rich harmonic and textural palette, and in the sensuous quality of the music with its ecstatic climaxes. Szymanowski brought his own set of mystical inspirations from Arab and Persian cultures, and from an idealized view of ancient Greece. The clearest examples are "the M's" (the Myths, op. 30, for Violin and Piano, and the two piano cycles, the Masques, op. 34 and Metopes op. 26), the Etudes for Piano, op. 33, and the Third Symphony, "Song of the Night", which has a close relationship to Scriabin's "Prometheus", op. 60.

Nikolai Miaskovsky

Miaskovsky is a composer shamefully neglected outside of Russia. I am sure that the most prolific symphonist of the twentieth century ought to be a name recognized by all musicians. The head of the Moscow Conservatory for many years, he was a good friend of Prokofiev's and dubbed "the musical conscience of Moscow." Miaskovsky began writing complex, brooding Romantic landscapes filled with a Scriabinesque ardor. These works deserve to be much better known, but unfortunately they did not mix well with the oppressive political climate. Miaskovsky was accused of "formalist perversions" and he changed his style to a simpler manner that the authorities believed the public could comprehend and therefore would serve the state. Whereas Prokofiev had acquired a huge reputation and travelled frequently to the West, and Shostakovich managed to use this oppression through ingenious means to his artistic advantage, I believe that Miaskovsky was artistically crushed by this climate. So let us ignore the later music but get to know the early symphonies, the Cello Concerto, and the Piano Sonatas 1-4!

Ruth Crawford (Seeger)

This remarkable composer, and wife of the noted musicologist Charles Seeger, is sometimes "discovered" by people with an interest in American music or in the early 20th century avant-garde, but oddly enough, rather rarely by those particularly interested in women composers. While she may have lacked the extraordinary precocity of Amy Beach, she was just as successful in finding a unique and personal approach to composition. Her period of maturity lasted, alas, only a very short time. In the late 1920's and early 1930's she was particularly attracted to mysticism and theosophy through her piano teacher Deeann Lavoie Herz. Though her music hardly sounds like Scriabin it does reveal the same kind of spirit that probes deeply into other-worldly mysteries. The String Quartet (1931) is Crawford's masterpiece: it is a short piece but one I find myself listening to over and over again.

Gunther Schuller

Schuller is best known for his idiom that questions, even defies the boundaries between "Classical" and "jazz" music, or "high art" and "low art" - a traditional and honorable preoccupation for an American composer. His great love of Scriabin is less well documented, until recently in the Scriabin Society of America Journal no. 2. There he describes how he spent hours at the piano with the score of Prometheus, getting those magical harmonies well into his fingers, although as he admitted he was hardly a pianist. Still, he couldn't help himself, even if his parents seem to think he had gone mad. Schuller's devotion to Prometheus was most noteworthy at the New England Conservatory, where he long served as director. He conducted performances of this work complete with lights - a most idealistic and impressive feat. Lacking an "Eastern" visionary, mystical approach he wisely steered clear of the Scriabin earmarks in his musical style, preferring jazz influences. However, we should note that Scriabin and Rachmaninoff, along with the French Impressionists, were well-known to early great jazz musicians such as Duke Ellington.

(By the way, my own way of "getting inside" Prometheus was to arrange the work for two pianos; surprisingly, no other such score is available today). My transcription can serve as a useful "study guide" for the work and as a practical tool for a solo pianist learning the part and wanting to hear the work without the luxury of a symphony orchestra in his room.)

Alexander Nemtin

The recently-deceased Nemtin will be forever linked with the name of Scriabin because of his extraordinary completions of the sketches for the Mysterium. In fact, owing to the fragmentary nature of these sketches, we really ought to consider Nemtin's work original compositions based on the material, rather than merely as "completions." Essentially, this project was this very courageous man's life work. In addition to this magnum opus, Nemtin put out some miniature piano pieces in the manner of late Scriabin. All of Nemtin's work reveals a keen compositional instinct as well as a detailed study and penetrating understanding of the music of Scriabin. Nemtin's work can now be heard on the disc "Preparations for the Final Mystery," with Vladimir Ashkenazy conducting and Alexei Lubimov at the piano.

Back to the top


A select Scriabin discography

Vladimir Horowitz, CBS Masterworks MK 42411 "Alexander Scriabin" contains Etudes from op. 8 and 42, the 9th and 10th sonatas, Vers la Flamme and some other short works. Miraculous playing from the man most responsible for Scriabin's recognition in this country.

Vladimir Horowitz, RCA Victor 6215-2-RG, "Horowitz plays Scriabin" contains the 3rd and 5th Sonatas and a large collection of Preludes, plus a few Etudes in a different interepretation from the above CD. A perfect companion disc to the previous one.

Sviatoslav Richter, Arkadia CDGI 910.1 "Alexander Scriabin" as played in Warsaw, October 27, 1972. Contains Preludes from op. 11, op. 37 and op. 74, Etudes from op. 42, the Sonatas no. 2, 5, and 9, and a few other miniatures. Another of the very great Scriabin players.

"Scriabin and the Scriabinians", Harmonia Mundi "Saison Russe" LDC 288032 and RUS 788032 (essentially identical). Hear great historical interpreters of Scriabin: the composer himself(!) , Alexander Goldenweiser, Samuel Feinberg, Heinrich Neuhaus, and Vladimir Sofronitsky. It is unfortunate that the recording technology was primitive in Scriabin's day but this is the best document we have. The other performances are also noteworthy; in particular, the Feinberg Mazurka interpretations are magical.

Vladimir Sofronitzki, "Scriabine Sonatas", Le Chant du Monde LDC 278 764. Contains the Sonatas nos. 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10. The composer's son-in-law was widely regarded as one of his greatest interpreters. This is a flamboyant and ambitious approach to the music.

Symphony no. 3 "Le Divin Poème", Le Poème de l'Extase. Deutsche Grammophon 427 324-2 New York Philharmonic directed by Giuseppe Sinopoli. Two of the great Scriabin orchestral works in an excellent performance and recording, by the great and recently deceased genius of the baton, Sinopoli.

"Preparations for the Final Mystery", Decca 289 466 329-2, Vladimir Ashkenazy conducting Berlin's Deutsches Symphony Orchestra, with Alexei Lubimov at the piano. An extraordinary composition based on Scriabin's sketches left incomplete that give a glimpse of the composer's gigantic visions.

Back to the top
Back to my music page


Page created by: scriabin@ix.netcom.com
Changes last made on: Wed Aug 27 23:00:00 2003