![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
WirelessMy interest in wireless started about 4 years ago. I looked at what appeared to be 300 little pieces of paper all around my small apartment with all kinds of names, address, appointments, and basically things I needed to do. Eventually all of this found its way into Outlook and that was fine, but what if I was not sitting in front of my computer. I bought my first Palm in 1999, and it cleaned house for me. It synched really well with Outlook and now in my hand was everything that was in my computer at home with the ability to add entries for contacts, create new appointments, add new notes, and even draft email. all of which was synched to the computer when I got home. This was really a very good thing.BluetoothNext, I looked at the spaghetti factory behind my
desktop and wondered if there was anything on the horizon that could
|
|
802.11a
|
54mbps top speed; incompatible with 802.11b
|
|
802.11b
|
11 mbps top speed popular in
home and small business networks
|
|
802.11e
|
Enhances audio and video transmission to 802.11a,
802.11b or 802.11g
|
|
802.11g
|
New standard with 54 mbps top speed; compatible
with 802.11b
|
|
802.11i
|
Adds enhanced 128 bit encryption to 802.11a, 802.11b and 802.11g |
|
802.1x
|
Security enhancement |
|
802.15
|
WPAN - wireless personal network standard for PDAs, PCs telephones, pagers and printers. This covers Bluetooth |
|
802.16
|
WMAN - wireless metropolitan area network |
Incorporation of the 802.11 standards moved handhelds from being PIMs straight to the corporate, educational, and healthcare mainstream.
![]() |
![]() |
|
The pda/cellphone combination with wireless internet capability is mobilizing the work force, saving time and moving data efficiently.
|
![]()
Wireless standards differ in the United States and
Europe. However, the perceived stumbling block to widespread adoption
of any of the 802.11 standards is security. Wireless networks are relatively
easy to set up because they leverage off the existing wired standard
802.2 and the OSI Reference model. As data travels up the OSI, its format
changes and different security standards are needed for each layer and
sub-layer.
Click here to read about Basic Networking
About
80% of internet hardware comes from Cisco Systems, so it is in Cisco's
best business interests to devote time and research dollars needed to
support this burgeoning technology. Along with Microsoft, they have
developed a ream of protocols for each layer and sublayer of the Physical
and Data Link layers of the OSI. Some of the layers run multiple protocols
to achieve different and most of the time greater levels of security.
Some of Cisco's protocols are proprietary to its hardware while others
are not. There are protocols for one layer, two layers, OR one of both
of the sub-layers of the MAC. Never forget the hackers out there who
have devoted their existence to breaking into any protocol developed
by anybody anywhere. Click here to go to
Cisco's Wireless Security white papers. Those robotic looking things
are Access Points for wireless networks.
All the security features go back to the original 802.11b specification that defined a security called WEP - wired equivalent privacy that is very easy to break. The IEEE could not foresee the possibilities of wireless networks. First, the easy extension of previously wired networks. Second, a fairly easy setup for a campus environment, either an educational institution or a corporate park. Third, nations with minimal telephone lines and unsophisticated communication infrastructures will have a easier time setting up a modern computer system with no wires.
Click Here to Return to my Home Page
© Lantastik Consulting, Inc.